Distressed Print Publications Making Mistakes
Posted on Thursday, July 01, 2010 at 2:58 PM
It's no secret that a lot of print publications are suffering.
Advertising is down. Subscriptions are down. The only thing that's up is
the number of casualties. Some major publications have already shut
down, along with a host of smaller ones.
Many publications,
however, are transitioning from print to online as a means of cutting
costs. After all, with revenues down, it would seem to make good sense
to reduce costs wherever possible. Switching to an online presentation
can almost instantly cut out a big chunk of expense: paper, printing,
distribution.
For most publications that have been print-only,
developing an effective online strategy is long overdue. Today's readers
have different expectations for how news and information should be
provided to them. The print-only model for many is a relic of yesteryear.
That
doesn't mean that there's no role for print in the mix. There are still
a lot of things that can be provided with greater utility in print than
online. But the idea of all print all the time has little relevance
today.
That said, many distressed print publications are making
transitions to online that are ill advised.
Coping with a
recessionary period has always put a strain on publishers. Usually, when
companies that use media advertising start feeling the pinch,
advertising budgets are among the first to be cut. As a result,
publishers are among the first to feel the pains of recession.
My
consulting firm has worked with publishers through quite a number of
recessionary periods. As a result, we've been able to observe some
general patterns that seem to repeat themselves each time. We've seen
publishers that are able to withstand tough economic times with only a
minimal amount of sacrifice. For some, business even improves. Others,
however, have their very existence threatened.
What's the
difference? Why do some thrive, while others fail? My own observation is
that the publishing companies that ran into the most trouble were
operating with troubled business strategies in the first place. When
times were good, they were able to coast along and even turn a profit.
But when the going got tough, they didn't have the inherent strength to
keep going.
That process reminds me of awhile back when my car
was overdue for a tune-up. When I cruised along on a flat stretch of
road, it ran with no apparent problems. But, if I drove up a steep hill,
the engine would start to sputter and cough, and the car had trouble
making it up the hill.
In past recessions, when publishing
companies in need of a strategic tune-up began having trouble making
ends meet, many realized something was amiss. That led them to address
the primary dysfunction that existed in their business plans and
strategies. As a result, many were able to pull through the recession
and emerge even stronger.
The problem today is that instead of
having that epiphany and subsequent adoption of new business strategies,
the publishers are merely opting to cut out the major print-related
expenses and go online. That's a mistake.
It's true that they
begin saving money. But in the end they're not saving their
publications. That's because they haven't routed out and changed the old
dysfunctional business concepts that led them to the trouble they're in.
What many publishers are doing is simply taking their print-style
content, along with their old business models, and moving them online.
They're
buying some time with this move. But they haven't fixed the underlying
problems. In effect, they're masking the symptoms rather than addressing
the cause.
Solid, sustainable results from publishing operations
are best achieved by using a sound, synergistic
business model. An economic downturn is a wonderful time to fix
longstanding flaws in your business model. Doing so will help you
survive the tough period. And it will also put you in a much stronger
position for attaining even greater levels of success when economic
conditions rebound.