Virtual Publishing Events Reimagined
Posted on Monday, November 30, 2020 at 10:50 PM
In the news: Publishers are exploring how to create engaging,
meaningful virtual event experiences for attendees.
The
pandemic has forced publication event planning into the digital realm.
There are certainly advantages: lower overhead, fewer logistical
headaches that typically come with on-location event planning, and
greatly reduced, if not eliminated, travel costs. But there are
downsides as well. “In general, virtual events are boring,” Kayleigh
Barber of Digiday.com writes. “At least that’s the sentiment bubbling up
from both attendees and advertisers eight months after the pivot to
virtual due to coronavirus crisis inexorably changed the events
business.”
This is a big problem for publishers, who are
exploring ways to keep events engaging in a socially distant world. “To
reignite the spark of excitement that experiential is meant to offer,
some publishers have begun testing the limits of hybrid events,” says
Barber, noting that many attendees find Zoom events to be lackluster
substitutes for in-person experiences. “[They are] continually staring
at a screen without the participatory elements or sensory moments that
provide connection to the speakers and to the audience or the feeling of
doing something out of the norm of the day-to-day.” Read more
bit.ly/2VLWexE” target=“blank”>here.
Also
Notable
Hearst Enhances Print Titles
Hearst
Magazines has launched Premium Print, reports NewsandTech.com this week.
The article says that, according to Hearst, Premium Print is “an
initiative that includes a multimillion-dollar investment across its
portfolio of more than 25 brands to further strengthen its position in
the marketplace and enhance the quality of its print products.” The
enhancements to the publisher’s print products come amid other changes,
including new paywall and membership modalities. Read more
bit.ly/36QoHJ0” target=“blank”>here.
Condé
Nast Explores Revenue Streams Condé Nast is looking at new ways to
generate revenue from its products, reports Anna Nicolaou in a November
20 piece in the Financial Times. CEO Roger Lynch is shaking
things up to compensate for pandemic-related shortfalls. Nicolaou
reports that Lynch is “investing about 10 per cent of the company’s
revenues into technology and content to boost online subscriptions and
ecommerce, while pushing into nascent business lines such as movie and
TV licensing for its writing ... to make money from its treasured
brands, apart from selling print adverts in its magazines -- an industry
that is in structural decline.” Read the complete article here.
Health
Check: How Are Magazines Faring in the Pandemic?
Earlier this
month, Kali Hays of Women’s Wear Daily assessed how the
magazine industry, both digital and print, are faring these days. As one
might expect, some magazines are doing better than others. Summing up
the state of things, Hays writes: “Nearly 40 percent of magazines that
publish on at least a quarterly basis have seen their audiences decline
so far this year, according to updated data from the Alliance for
Audited Media.... That’s on top of a major pullback in advertising this
year due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and the related contraction
of the global economy.” Read more here.
A
Push to Classify Social Media as Publishers
In a recent Editor
& Publisher piece, TAPInto.net CEO/publisher Michael Shapiro
makes a case for reclassifying social media sites as publishers under
Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. Currently, social
media sites are shielded from liability for user-generated content, but
Shapiro argues that it’s time for this to change. Lawmakers on both
sides of the aisle agree; Shapiro notes that “Democrats believe that
platforms aren’t doing enough to moderate disinformation and hate
speech, while Republicans are arguing that platforms are censoring
conservative perspectives.” So while the current arrangement is
beneficial to the social media companies themselves, allowing them to
proliferate unchecked as new sources, that arrangement is a threat to
democracy, says Shapiro. “Without a framework for more effective
moderation,” he says, “Americans are getting an increasingly steady diet
of disinformation and misinformation that is given credibility by its
spread on social media. This is having a deleterious effect on American
civic life and is leading to increased polarization.” Read more here.
Add
your comment.
Posted in (RSS)